The Overcrowded
Lifeboat
In 1842, a ship struck an iceberg and more than 30
survivors were crowded into a lifeboat intended to hold 7. As a storm
threatened, it became obvious that the lifeboat would have to be
lightened if anyone were to survive. The captain reasoned that the
right thing to do in this situation was to force some individuals to
go over the side and drown. Such an action, he reasoned, was not
unjust to those thrown overboard, for they would have drowned anyway.
If he did nothing, however, he would be responsible for the deaths of
those whom he could have saved. Some people opposed the captain's
decision. They claimed that if nothing were done and everyone died as
a result, no one would be responsible for these deaths. On the other
hand, if the captain attempted to save some, he could do so only by
killing others and their deaths would be his responsibility; this
would be worse than doing nothing and letting all die. The captain
rejected this reasoning. Since the only possibility for rescue
required great efforts of rowing, the captain decided that the
weakest would have to be sacrificed. In this situation it would be
absurd, he thought, to decide by drawing lots who should be thrown
overboard.
A Father's
Agonizing Choice
You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A
sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and
wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you
don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate
as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says.